Before systems diverge. Before narratives harden. Before accountability fragments.
I enter without touching systems or changing processes. I stabilise what is written, without assigning blame or exposure. I exit leaving a version of events that holds without me.
What remains after I leave
A written chain of events that can be replayed, audited, and defended — without interpretation.
Trigger
RGRA is engaged at the moment written reality must remain one — at the start (entry lock), midstream (fracture containment), or at closure (defensible reconstruction).
Always before interpretation replaces record.
The trigger is rarely a technical failure alone. It is the moment when:
RGRA is brought in to answer only that — in writing — before narrative replaces evidence.
Engagement typically begins with a single written decision or flow.
RGRA produces one coherent evidentiary chain, or explicitly records why such a chain cannot yet exist.
Illustrative format only. No assurance or opinion is provided.
Operating stance
Working Principle
Interface drift, mixed clocks, contradictory logs.
Verbal go-aheads and non-traceable execution.
Operational ambiguity reframed as certainty.
Records prepared for executive and evidentiary review.
If this page resonates immediately, pressure is already present.
It usually appears quietly — through parallel records, unresolved handovers, or incompatible explanations of the same event.
By the time it becomes visible, options are already constrained.
No dashboards.
No templates.
No system access.
This work operates exclusively on written records and defensible reconstruction.
Once the written record diverges, alignment does not self-correct.
This work is intentionally limited in scope and engagement count.